WordPress is the leading Content Management System (CMS) in the world. It makes up over 64% of the websites on any CMS. In case you are wondering, that translates into 43% of all websites on the internet (W3 Techs). That’s a big deal.
Unlike some of its competitors, WordPress has the major benefit of being agnostic to where a site is hosted. Shopify, Wix, and Squarespace sites are all built on proprietary platforms hosted by the companies themselves. This means once you build a site on one of those platforms, you will remain there at least until you re-build your site elsewhere. In essence, you’re locked in.
This can be a very useful feature of the platform, but also brings with it a very important question for someone building on WordPress. Where do you actually want to host your WordPress site? There are certainly a number of options. Since WordPress is agnostic to the server it runs on, the options run the gamut from Cloud hosted servers all the way down to a computer hosted in your very own basement; a place which we’d not suggest, for the record. Some maintain that is because computers get depressed in the dark. 😉
Most people are not in the business these days of maintaining their own hosting hardware. For WordPress, this even extends out to include the upkeep of much of the underlying software including the web server (i.e. Apache vs. nginx), the database (MySQL), and supporting web languages (PHP). That means most hosts offer what they might call “Managed WordPress Hosting” which basically means you can click a button to get WordPress installed. However, that really doesn’t tell the whole story about what you get. That makes the selection process even more complicated.
What Matters for Hosting
Speed
Speed is probably the biggest factor in the success of a website. If a page loads too slowly, visitors get frustrated and “bounce.” It also is a factor in Search Engine Optimization (SEO) because what search engine wants to send people to a a page that is going to frustrate them? Finally, the faster a page loads, the more momentum a visitor has for any excitement involved with an online purchase. This is why multiple studies have shown that even small increases in page speed can increase both conversions and order size significantly.
So, how do hosting choices impact website speed? It’s basically a question of available computing power compared to the demand of serving up the pages to visitors. The more pages being requested, the more computing power is needed. The demand can come from traffic to your site or maybe even to other sites if they are being hosted on the same computer. Hosting companies manage these resources in different ways to makes sure the get the right traffic and demands on the right computers so that they can provide the most speed without running more computers than they need.
The difficulty is that the demands aren’t always predictable, and spikes in traffic can have a big impact. So, in addition to providing the right speed, hosts have to find ways to manage for those scenarios as well.
Uptime
It should be somewhat obvious that if the website isn’t working, there’s going to be a loss in money. It’s hard to get a true monitoring of how well a host does in keeping up its end of the bargain on uptime, though. Is the problem with an individual site? Is the problem with the server? Is the problem with a network issue between the visitor and the hosting server that has nothing to do with either the host or the website itself?
There are a number of small tests run by people with varying degrees of precision for determining the role the hosting service plays in uptime. Still, the numbers are useful if one is trying to make a reasoned decision about which host is less likely to have a problem.
Support and Features
This is the really difficult part of any comparison. Not every host provides the same kind of services in their offerings. We took a look at what we have found to be most important for our clients and did a review of what each managed WordPress host offered in their plans. The features were chosen because of how we historically have benefited from them in the past and how often we relied on them for keeping a site running or gracefully making changes along the way.
Comparing the Providers
We selected 12 major providers of managed WordPress hosting. Many are reviewed regularly by blogs all over the internet. We put together a quick chart for your reference along with our own scoring in several categories.
Here are the Hosts:
- A2 Hosting
- BlueHost
- Cloudways
- Dreamhost
- GoDaddy
- GreenGeeks
- Kinsta
- Liquid Web
- Pantheon
- SiteGround
- WP Engine (with and without the C2 performance options)
- WPX Hosting
Speed Results
Hosting Provider | GTMetrix Page Load | GTMetrix TTFB | Pingdom Page Load | High load response time: | Our Combined Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pantheon | 810ms | 93ms | 359ms | 4ms | 1 |
WPX Hosting | 800ms | 111ms | 357ms | 26ms | 2 |
Kinsta | 1600ms | 696ms | 835ms | 24ms | 3 |
GoDaddy | 1670ms | 279ms | 852ms | incomplete | 4 |
WP Engine | 2270ms | 539ms | 1820ms | 17ms | 5 |
Liquid Web | 2070ms | 444ms | 1948ms | 99ms | 5 |
Cloudways | 1850ms | 390ms | 1582ms | incomplete | 5 |
WP Engine C2 | 2270ms | 556ms | 1402ms | 23ms | 8 |
DreamHost | 2240ms | 449ms | 1934ms | 236ms | 9 |
A2 Hosting | 2180ms | 547ms | 1830ms | 302ms | 10 |
BlueHost | 2040ms | 453ms | 2371ms | incomplete | 11 |
Green Geeks | 2200ms | 538ms | 2385ms | incomplete | 12 |
SiteGround | 2440ms | 841ms | 2481ms | 69ms | 13 |
Matthew Woodward put together a great set of tests to check out the speed of the 12 different providers. He even broke out two levels of service for the very popular WP Engine hosting platform. The article is definitely worth the read if you want to get into the nitty gritty details of how the tests were run as well as his take on the results. We differ slightly from his end assessment, but his methodology was sound and produced some very illustrative results.
As you can see from the summary table here, there is more than one way to measure server speed. Overall page load speed is good for assessing not just the server speed, but also of the page design, coding, and overall “leanness” of the webpage. It’s a great one to start with and he includes that stat from two separate tools to add some validity. He also includes Time to First Byte (TTFB), which is much more focused on the server itself. This tells you how quickly the server 1) receives the request, 2) processes the request, and then 3) begins transmitting data back to the user’s web browser. This measure is a great one to include since it really focuses on the infrastructure the host provides to serve web pages to your site visitors. If your server responds more slowly than your competitor’s to simply get the first byte out to the requesting web browser, it’ll be hard for it to catch up in order to load the page in full faster than for your competitor.
Finally, he does a load test. Basically, this is simulating a point when there is a big influx of traffic in a spike of activity. In other words, what happens when you go viral and suddenly the entire world is trying to buy your stuff? Will the server keep up? We feel this and the TTFB measurements were a little overshadowed in Woodward’s assessment and deserve a bigger influence on the outcome.
In the end, we combined all of these tests and averaged out how each host “placed” for each part of the speed assessment. from that we created an overall speed ranking that we fell is a pretty accurate sense of who is going to really provide speed no matter the traffic levels you might see. In truth, the two standouts here? Pantheon and WPX Hosting are pretty much twice as fast as their nearest competitors and really shine here. Something that surprised us, though, was the measurements made to compare WP Engine’s two plan levels. It seems the basic level plan outperformed the higher priced package. There could be any number of reasons why this happened, and the actual differences are small in absolute terms, but the overall impact put a big distance between them in our rankings.
Uptime Results
Hosting Provider | Advertised / Observed Uptime | Our Combined Ranking |
---|---|---|
Liquid Web | 99.9992% | 1 |
Pantheon | 99.99% | 2 |
Cloudways | 99.99% | 2 |
SiteGround | 99.99% | 2 |
DreamHost | 99.98% | 5 |
A2 Hosting | 99.98% | 6 |
BlueHost | 99.97% | 7 |
WPX Hosting | 99.95% | 8 |
WP Engine | 99.95% | 8 |
WP Engine C2 | 99.95% | 8 |
GoDaddy | 99.92% | 11 |
Kinsta | 99.9% | 12 |
Green Geeks | 99.9% | 12 |
Determining a host’s uptime is often a challenge. As we said earlier, it can be disputed between those running tests, the end users, and the hosts themselves as to what the real number is. That said, we looked around each of the provider’s sites to see what they had to say about their actual uptime has been historically. In some cases, we weren’t able to find an answer on the host’s website, so we searched for an answer on the internet until we could come up with a best guess.
Here, the big leader is Liquid Web. They boast a 99.9992% uptime. It may not seem like a big deal to add the extra “9” to the uptime number, but it has a big impact in the long run. The closest to them is a three-way tie between Pantheon, Cloudways, and SiteGround all with 99.99%. Please note: we allowed ties and ranked the results like sports competitions. We did this so we had a good way to summarize our overall rankings.
Support and Features Results
Hosting Provider | Included / Free Backups | Included / Free SSL Certificates | Included / Free CDN | Phone Support | Chat Support | Email Support | Staging Environment | Git Integration | Automated Updates | Visual Regression on Automated Updates | Points | Our Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pantheon | 9 | 1 | ||||||||||
GoDaddy | 8 | 2 | ||||||||||
Liquid Web | 8 | 2 | ||||||||||
WP Engine | 7 | 4 | ||||||||||
WP Engine C2 | 7 | 4 | ||||||||||
Kinsta | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
WPX Hosting | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
A2 Hosting | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
BlueHost | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
SiteGround | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
Cloudways | 5 | 11 | ||||||||||
DreamHost | 5 | 11 | ||||||||||
Green Geeks | 5 | 11 |
We took a pretty simple approach to ranking providers here. As we mentioned, there are a number of features we consider essential to any hosting platform. Those are, of course, included in our list of features. There are also other features that we have found to be more than a little bit useful. These are focused more on what tools exist to help maintain a site over time. Having the ability to make code changes and apply updates to the site and to check for incompatibilities is key to making upkeep easier and smoother for any WordPress site. It is at least doubly important to avoid extended downtimes for e-commerce sites.
Our top two providers both have a very important feature. They allow automation of updates with the very big and important visual regression testing prior to deploying those updates to the live website. Really, any of our top 3 hosts (Pantheon, GoDaddy, Liquid Web) provide features we think you’d want to make sure you have included as part of their entry level packages. You can generally add some of the missing ones for additional fees, should you decide to use another provider.
The Winner is…
Let’s bring it all together now…
We have been ranking all of these providers on these various aspects. Now we can take the placement for each area and do a quick “average rank” to see how they did overall. In the end your top three are:
- Pantheon
- Liquid Web
- WPX Hosting
If you look below, you can also see the cost for each provider. We didn’t want to weigh cost directly because we wanted our focus to be on the performance and benefits of the hosting platforms. We did want to make sure you had that very useful bit of information at your fingertips, so you can make your own decisions, however.
Hosting Provider | Speed | Uptime | Support and Features | Average Rank | Monthly Cost |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pantheon | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1.33 | $41 |
LiquidWeb | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2.67 | $29 |
WPX Hosting | 2 | 8 | 6 | 5.33 | $20.83 |
GoDaddy | 4 | 11 | 2 | 5.67 | $14.99 |
WP Engine | 5 | 8 | 4 | 5.67 | $35 |
Cloudways | 5 | 2 | 11 | 6 | $22 |
WP Engine (C2 Tier) | 8 | 8 | 4 | 6.67 | $600 |
SiteGround | 13 | 2 | 6 | 7 | $14.99 |
Kinsta | 3 | 12 | 6 | 7 | $30 |
A2Hosting | 10 | 6 | 6 | 7.33 | $33.99 |
BlueHost | 11 | 7 | 6 | 8 | $28.99 |
DreamHost | 9 | 5 | 11 | 8.33 | $29.95 |
GreenGeeks | 12 | 12 | 11 | 11.67 | $24.95 |
What We Use for Our Clients
Savvy readers will note that Two Row Studio offers Hosting and Maintenance plans for WordPress. We do! Why would we be reviewing all these providers and not include our own? Well, that’s because our plans include hands on maintenance and support for more than just the basic updates. We also do minor upkeep that doesn’t fall in the prevue of hosting companies. We do however act as a reseller of two of the hosts described here.
Pantheon
As you can see, Pantheon excels in its performance for WordPress installations. Their platform is extremely flexible and robust. Since Two Row Studio is primarily a WordPress customization and integration development shop, we need a platform that can adapt to all of our clients, help us manage code version controls, and still provide fast and reliable webpage serving even when we’re not actively developing new features for our clients. In our experience, the Pantheon platform is built with workflows that make our work and support seem like magic to our clients. Their sites can remain up to date and deploy new features over time with nearly 0 downtime. We can use version control through Git to branch off new projects while maintaining core WP, theme, and plugin updates without having to worry about conflicts and incompatibilities ever affecting the live website.
Also, as a reseller, we are able to obtain some pricing discounts that enable us to offer all our support and high-performance hosting at a very affordable cost. We love their Autopilot update system which applies new updates and tests them before they get released to the live websites. From time to time (more often than you’d think!), WP updates cause incompatibilities. The tests Autopilot runs stop deployments if there are even visual differences after the updates are applied. This gives us the chance to react to incompatibilities as the arise, make manual adjustments where needed, and then deploy the patched updates to the live system. For us, it’s the only system we’ll use for sites that we maintain for clients.
GreenGeeks
We also are a reseller for GreenGeeks. While we don’t use GreenGeeks’ Managed WordPress services, we offer a basic hosting package that runs on their servers. These sites generally are not trying to optimize SEO, nor are their sites a central part of their marketing or business operations. They just need a place that can host their web pages at a more affordable price.
Why did we choose GreenGeeks? Simple, the pricing at this level of hosting is pretty similar. GreenGeeks is special in this realm in that they ensure all of the power used to run their servers and equipped is supplied by renewable energy. We see it as our way of giving a little bit back to Mother Earth.
What do you think of our ratings? Love them? Hate them? Let us know in the comments and share your experiences!